Why US F-35 Would Completely Destroy Russian Su-57

Why US F-35 Would Completely Destroy Russian Su-57

The Military Show

7 месяцев назад

190,019 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@forureyesonly
@forureyesonly - 13.03.2024 12:39

Get the fact right. F35 is not stealthily than the F22

Ответить
@DrDerekG73
@DrDerekG73 - 14.03.2024 06:12

The fact there havent been dog fights in years doesnt mean they will not happen. F35 CANNOT get into an air to air with Felons over Europe.. Their stealth will not matter.. Felons upgrades, AR helmet (Temu F35 helmet) new engines etc.. I think in air to air over eastern Europe.. F35 is outmatched by Felon.

Ответить
@RobertMS1979
@RobertMS1979 - 14.03.2024 08:33

They should match up the f22 raptor to the su57. The raptor is still better than both.

Ответить
@lynx-alpha2073
@lynx-alpha2073 - 15.03.2024 13:24

In a su57 vs F35 would lose all their su 35s with bodykit.

With su 35s just being engineswapped su27s with a new missle.

And su27s would lose to f15s

So russia still cant beat our 40 year old planes

Ответить
@gofoats
@gofoats - 16.03.2024 10:59

As much as I love Fat Amy for her intelligence and ability to talk to the rest of the squarand; we are upgrading the F-22. This pane is so dangerous it is not even funny. Does the Su-57 want to tangle with a aircraft that has firing solution and fox-3 before the pilot has to yank the pretty handles to leave the doomed plane? The FUSSR can't afford losing any SU-57s. They don't have enough for a decent air show. We are upgrading a large block of F-22s as we speak. Imagine a Raptor with the brains of Fat Amy.

Ответить
@asynchronicity
@asynchronicity - 17.03.2024 21:37

Russia is going backwards.

Ответить
@johnjacobs3502
@johnjacobs3502 - 19.03.2024 02:03

......

Ответить
@MrGoMC
@MrGoMC - 19.03.2024 23:36

All this considered, Russia is currently winning a war against NATO

Ответить
@tshavfengvang7831
@tshavfengvang7831 - 20.03.2024 23:09

Don't forget the S-400s on the ground will be looking up. 😅

Ответить
@Jack-u1o1o
@Jack-u1o1o - 21.03.2024 10:37

Never underestimate a politician's ability to screw things up. "You can't shoot until you visually identify the target."

Ответить
@fordstrokers
@fordstrokers - 24.03.2024 10:08

What part of the Russian military is not complete garbage? Russia is the gold medal winner of the paper tiger Olympics

Ответить
@JeffSouthEastLouisiana
@JeffSouthEastLouisiana - 27.03.2024 08:32

They'd never. Never ever? Never see a F35 and would be smoldering before that F35 would before turning home.

Ответить
@1badjesus
@1badjesus - 28.03.2024 06:49

300 F-35s exist. 33 SU-57s exist. Game over.

Ответить
@1badjesus
@1badjesus - 28.03.2024 07:15

F-35 initial plan gave ALL variants 4 missiles NO cannon; evidently Brass learned NOTHING from Vietnam where Phantoms lack of canon (despite pilot continued request) resulted in combat losses/unable to fulfill missions cuz "outta missiles you're outta fight!". It was Air Force INSISTENCE their variant A be given internal cannon. WHY Brass ok'd absurd low payload/NO canon for B&C is insanity; "oh but external provides more..." IT MAKES AIRCRAFT VISIBLE TO RADAR.. making F-35 stealth redundant.

Ответить
@nealramsey4439
@nealramsey4439 - 28.03.2024 22:54

Turning away is the only way to notch a missile. So the SU-57 is going to be more visible when trying to defend against a missile. Not a good sign for the Felon.

Ответить
@simonj5615
@simonj5615 - 29.03.2024 16:03

Russia's stealth technology is so awesome, they even have the Armata tank which nobody has ever seen.

Ответить
@simonj5615
@simonj5615 - 29.03.2024 16:08

facing F35s in combat is going to be utterly terrifying for the other side. You will be aware that they are somewhere ahead of you, but have no idea exactly where.

Ответить
@michaelingram9583
@michaelingram9583 - 05.04.2024 17:03

Sorry but you got your information wrong between the F-35 and the F-22's radar cross section! This is a common myth that keeps getting spread about but if you LOOK up the actual FACTS about the two you will see that the F-35 has a cross section of 0.005ms to the F-22's cross section of 0.001ms!!! Quite a difference there where the F-35 is the size of a golf ball on radar the F-22 is the size of a marble or a bumblebee roughly which is about 1/5th or less of the cross section of the F-35 just figured I'd help you out a bit on that I grew up by whitemans air force base and have always been a huge fan of our American aircrafts especially the F-22 of course it's always been a big favorite there's not much outside of confidential information that I don't know about that jet 😊🫡

Ответить
@1roman_56
@1roman_56 - 08.04.2024 18:28

SU57 has so good stealth, even their own pilots cant see it

Ответить
@voxfan7403
@voxfan7403 - 16.04.2024 05:56

The F-35 is stealthier than the F-22? I think not!

Ответить
@NickAndTech
@NickAndTech - 24.04.2024 04:41

They've got to do better with that step ladder for the F-35 though, don't need the pilot for a $100 million jet breaking a leg 😆

Ответить
@brentwhitson5653
@brentwhitson5653 - 29.04.2024 03:03

An F-35 golf ball is not smaller than the F-22 marble... How do numerous sights keep getting this wrong?...

Ответить
@antoniomontana872
@antoniomontana872 - 08.05.2024 07:47

Russia has a total of no more than 7 prototype stealthy-in-name only Su-57s!

Ответить
@robertcuellar4132
@robertcuellar4132 - 08.05.2024 18:15

Only 29% of f 35 are mission capable paper tiger su 57 already has kills f 22 barley flys and only shot ballons out of the sky😢

Ответить
@ViceCoin
@ViceCoin - 10.05.2024 18:08

F35 has 29% readiness, can't fly at Mach 1 without melting, and has never worked in peer combat.

Ответить
@DavidMontelongo-mk3xi
@DavidMontelongo-mk3xi - 11.05.2024 05:15

The SU57 is absolutely NOT a 5th gen and is NOT stealth

Ответить
@blackstoneblkstntv5551
@blackstoneblkstntv5551 - 12.05.2024 12:06

false report

Ответить
@hxkdneuxbxjdidndnxj
@hxkdneuxbxjdidndnxj - 12.05.2024 16:39

from the creators of “why NATO weapons would dominate on the battlefield”

Ответить
@frios011
@frios011 - 15.05.2024 21:18

Big differences always exist between single engine and double engine planes!

Ответить
@JonathanDickson-w2g
@JonathanDickson-w2g - 17.05.2024 02:22

Usa don't no how to fight a mordin war how many hours combat does the f35 have or f22 none a ballon what joje

Ответить
@RaySarv
@RaySarv - 17.05.2024 02:23

F35 and F22 do called stealth advantage is obsolete against Russian new fighter jet Proton radars, which stealth is no longer a relevant, for all you Hollywood action movie BS that has made you to believe how superior US military technology is grater then others, soon you will realize that’s not the case at all.

Ответить
@Gusfer-ze8lw
@Gusfer-ze8lw - 28.05.2024 03:24

You really need to evolve to metric system...

Ответить
@goodz3752
@goodz3752 - 03.06.2024 17:04

What pisses me off as a proud citizen of the US, is how US Intelligence in collaboration with the Military Industrial Complex, has historically been way too quick & willing (perhaps even enthused) to just accept the many overly optimistic & at times even absurd claims made by the world's boogeymen (China & Russia,) regarding their supposed military capabilities?! This despite having knowledge to the contrary. I mean, how else can they justify the endless tax payer dollars they frequently waste on canceled defense projects or the millions they sometimes even "lose," like all that money that went "missing" that was supposed to go to locals in Iraq/Afghanistan in exchange for them risking their lives to cooperate with our troops?! It behooves them to be able to point to a big bad wolf that we're supposed to fear. Without that they can't keep the gravy train rolling! Imagine if American's knew how shitty the Russian Military was?! In the 20 years that the US just fought in the Middle East fighting in two wars, the US had less casualties that entire time than Russia has in just an average month! See, our Government does this with respect to economic threats as well! In the 80's, all you heard is talk of the sky falling because Japan was sure to surpass us economically by the turn of the millennium! By the end of 1995 however, it was clear that was most definitely not happening. But no worries, the Government's always got a replacement monster in reserve ready to scare us into obedience. This new monster was perfect, though, because it could be used to justify economic policies as well as Defense policies- CHINA!
"We can't be expected to address our country's obnoxiously absurd wealth gap right now because obviously we're not going to do anything crazy like make the wealthy pay their fair share & we have to do everything in our power right now to keep our wealthiest big businesses & business men getting wealthier, lest we allow China to surpass us economically before they're expected to anyway in 2035!"
Well, once again, the experts have reneged on their prediction & now admit that China may not even ever surpass us at all & they most certainly won't pass us in 2035!
So, yeah, question everything! I can't say for sure, but I did find it interesting how right when we began to realize just how much we'd overestimated Russia's Military, that's right around the exact time the Government did that unprecedented Congressional hearing concerning UAP's or UFO's or whatever they call them now. Lol! It was almost like, "Oh-oh, we need a new bad guy again!" And the story continues...

Ответить
@christianlloydenciso3480
@christianlloydenciso3480 - 23.06.2024 08:22

So the the long war Ukraine Putin & Zi Ginping bluffing the world that they the super power Russia& China

Ответить
@silentblackhole
@silentblackhole - 26.06.2024 10:04

This is like judging who would win between a man and a child.

Ответить
@TrivkaKovac-es7mj
@TrivkaKovac-es7mj - 01.07.2024 08:36

ARE YOU DREAMING????

Ответить
@jacksonteller1337
@jacksonteller1337 - 04.07.2024 14:26

The F-16V would outclass the Su-57.

Ответить
@AndreVanDiggelen-wl3fx
@AndreVanDiggelen-wl3fx - 09.07.2024 04:36

F-22 standing speechless in the back of the room............

Ответить
@Heinrih86
@Heinrih86 - 15.07.2024 19:14

Bought crafts are beautiful ,but how beautiful is Skills 🤔😀

Ответить
@edwarren804
@edwarren804 - 22.07.2024 12:34

Analysis ❌
Hypocrisy Analysis ✅

Ответить
@johnthom3342
@johnthom3342 - 28.07.2024 06:04

Russia always understates performance specs. The US is way behind.

Ответить
@GeoffReed-y3e
@GeoffReed-y3e - 30.07.2024 02:22

Just like the T14 tank all smoke and mirrors. more Russian bullshit

Ответить
@dragonmyke
@dragonmyke - 06.08.2024 06:50

Ahahahaha!

Ответить
@Armonia2810
@Armonia2810 - 11.08.2024 17:24

the SU-57 can outperform the F-35 in every engagement scenario of a classic dogfight. you said it very well. But what you didn't say is that the SU-57 can also destroy any missile that the F-35 launches against it, we have seen this in practice, the soviet-made su-34s, which are bombers, do it many times. so unfortunately such a confrontation will either end up with the F-35 destroyed from the missile that in 2 seconds will launch the su-57 or a dogfight where the F-35 doesn't will have no luck. the only planes that can go somewhat against the SU-57 are the F-22s and those under conditions since they are quite old and of lower technology.

Ответить
@omsi2337
@omsi2337 - 15.08.2024 09:44

F35 is a successful ponzi scheme.

Ответить
@Boris-do5rs
@Boris-do5rs - 12.09.2024 07:07

The SU 57 is now the apex predator of all fighter aircraft in the entire world.

Ответить
@riccardocorengia2799
@riccardocorengia2799 - 13.09.2024 11:58

look like Su 57 is far better plane..

Ответить