Комментарии:
FSR has too many artifacts!
Ответитьweird frametime graph hahaha fake fg amd rubish
ОтветитьDLSS always look better than FSR...FSR keep having ghosting and flickering. DLSS also does better in FPS too
Ответитьahyetь
Ответить0.1-0.3ms!!
ОтветитьMy itch to upgrade from RTX 3080 to 4080 has been relieved. No need to upgrade. THANK YOU, AMD.
ОтветитьI have 30fps native on my 3080ti, with frame gen i have 60-70 but it feels like 20-25 sometime
ОтветитьFSR 3...NEW BLUR Tech😂
ОтветитьDlss looks better
Ответитьignore the frametime graph, RTSS must be updated because it is bugged with FSR3 FG since it is new.
ОтветитьWell, yes, DLSS still has better image quality than FSR, and it's natural, DLSS uses tensor cores and all of that, but the fact that FSR actually works on a lot of GPUs and FSR 3 Frame Gen puts out some pretty good results with decent latency (I tested it with my RX 6700 XT and RTX 3050), I can say I can ignore that shimmering and use FSR 3 Frame Gen, even tho I still think AMD needs to work on making its upscaler a little bit better.
ОтветитьDiss definitely looks the best while still boosting frames, but i don’t even care about the minute visual details when fsr with frame gen is pushing way more frames. Also I heard fsr increases input delay and latency, is this true?
ОтветитьDLSS 3?
ОтветитьDLSS #1
FSR=TRASH 😂😂😂
O antiserrilhado do FSR tá melhor que o nativo do jogo. Incrível!
ОтветитьChannel continues to show itself as "Hater AMD", since in several videos it ignores the information in the driver itself, that the MSI does not capture frames generated by FSR 3, and continues to disseminate comparisons with it, inducing the public to think that the technology does not work.
ОтветитьWhy not 7900XTX?!
ОтветитьWhen you look at FSR textures you can feel like in Christmas.
ОтветитьLook at that frametime wall 😂
ОтветитьAmd still has a lot of work to beat nvidia software wise, still a good amount of artifacts with fsr
ОтветитьWhat program do you use to test FPS?
ОтветитьFsr 3 хуйня полная по графону хуже чем dlss 3....Nvidia выпустила нормальный dlss 3.5 который и по графике и по фпс уничтожит fsr 3.Пускай маленькие фанатики признают что амд умеет делать только видеокарты и процессоры,но генерация кадров и аналог Ray Trasing у них говно полное.
ОтветитьSo sad that AMD have this FPS drop problem with their Frame Generation. Otherwise it would be a killer feature .....
Hope they will fix it soon ....
What do you thing is better now rtx3060 12gb rtx 4060 rtx3060ti. Thanks
ОтветитьCould FSR3 FG work on my RTX 3080 10GB?🤔
ОтветитьGarbage useless technology, look at frametime :)
ОтветитьUpscaling and frame generations should be possible only for younger cards. Letting them work on high-end GPUs allows both Nvidia and AMD to let customers buy the same hardware spect with minimal adjustments and just improved software part that generates frames between already existing ones, it's not real productivity it's visualization of it.
I'm not saying that technology itself is bad, it's pretty fine, the way they exploit and sell it to people is bad.
Fun fact : FSR is an amazing technology. Look at FSR latency.
ОтветитьConsidering the fact that fsr 3 works on everything and you must pay for dlss, slight image quality deacrease with fsr is manageable.
ОтветитьAMD needs to do to FSR what Intel did to XeSS. Make it work on any GPU, but be enhanced through AI on their own hardware. I hope they go fo this direction on the next generation of GPUs.
Ответитьmsy Afterburner its buggy.
it's not the correct data. AMD overlay shows correct data
C’est clairement un torchon, Pro AMD, parce que montrer le FSR 3 avec le Fra génération, mais d’un côté laisser le D. LSS de NVIDIA, sans le DLLA qui est le Frame génération de NVidia qui clairement met 30 à 50 FPS dans les dents de AMD
ОтветитьDlss 1.0……. Vs fsr3……. And dlss is still better.
ОтветитьI think AMD needs to work on shimmering that happens in Quality mode on far objects. Apart from that, it's perfect.
ОтветитьWe are relying on fake frames now. Great.
ОтветитьJust "dlss". Very good comparison... Smh.
ОтветитьIsn't good FSR 3, so far is
ОтветитьFor people dont have dlss 3 and dont have the capability to upgrade then AFMF is still a solution unless you hate the game
ОтветитьYou should check out Daniel Owen's video on FSR 3 because its buggy with Afterburner. Hence, the all white reading on those graphs with AMD's Frame Gen.
ОтветитьI have bought 7900XT Sapphire Pulse on march... I abandonned Nvidia for 20 years fidelity... Just think about it dude
Ответить1440p, dlss quality or balanced?
ОтветитьSlow Poker
Ответитьme with 1050ti... is this a W for me in future games ? (not this forspoken)
ОтветитьNvdia gives feature to boost fps (fg)
People : fake frames boooo!
Amd copies it with less quality
People : Thanks amd wohooo!
Wow dls killing it!!!
The image quality in dlss not only better than fsr but better than native itself!
Now understand why software upscale can't ever compete with hardware upscale