Комментарии:
Another murdered of democracy by the BJP govt.
ОтветитьProbably one of the last nails to the coffin of democracy and transparency regarding election commission.
ОтветитьWow, they can do anything to win elections. Why government was so concern about this committee.
Ответитьindian is growing in a backward manner as far as democracy is concern. Modi is killing the ethos of this country is building upon.
ОтветитьWe were far far better under the British rule than today's regime
ОтветитьBjp pura Dara huwa hei bas
ОтветитьIse kehte hai adikh tanashahi aur gulami. Par ham phir bhi apne Dil ko tasali dete hue 5 August aur 26 January manayge?
Ответитьअगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जाजो अप्पोइन्ट करने का अधिकार केंद्र सरकार को नही है, तो सुप्रीम कोर्ट को केंद्र सरकार के कामों अप्पोइन्मेंट हस्तक्षेप करने का अधिकार नही है।😂
Ответитьअगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जाजो अप्पोइन्ट करने का अधिकार केंद्र सरकार को नही है, तो सुप्रीम कोर्ट को केंद्र सरकार के कामों अप्पोइन्मेंट हस्तक्षेप करने का अधिकार नही है।😂
Ответитьअगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जाजो अप्पोइन्ट करने का अधिकार केंद्र सरकार को नही है, तो सुप्रीम कोर्ट को केंद्र सरकार के कामों अप्पोइन्मेंट हस्तक्षेप करने का अधिकार नही है।😂
ОтветитьAccording to Supreme Court the panel that involves the Chief Justice in the selection process of EC stands until a proper law is proposed to stop the illegal practice in appointing or extending the tenure of Election Commissioner. The basic purpose to stop BJP appointing Commissioners of their choice and ensure malpractices are avoided. BJP in reality has thrived on malpractices to come to power. Court wouldn't have interfered in this process unless petitions from public and opposition filed. Public convinced by unconstitutional practices in the last ten years amounting to depriving the voting rights of the people like tampering of EVM machines, purchasing elected MLAs and MPs from other parties. This has become an issue therefore SC has rightly interfered taking notice of the threat to the constitutional rights of the people.
Bills can always be challenged before it becomes a law if suspicion rises.
However once the matter is challenged in the court bill to be passed will be delayed. Possibilities for the bill proposed to be quashed.
Under such delay court ruling that Chief Justice to be part of selection panel of appointing Election Commissioner stands.
The judiciary is alert and won't make things easy for the Center to have its way.
I don't know the current procedure, but in my opinion the following will ensure the independence of the above officials:
1) The selection committee consists of the PM, LOP, and CJI.
2) The MHA proposes the name(s).
(3) The Selection Committee recommends a name for the President's approval.
(4) The President may approve or ask the Selection Committee to reconsider its recommendation.
4) If the Selection Committee recommends the same name, the President is bound to approve.