15 = 3 x 5: Erik Lucero's Quantum Computing Breakthrough

Why is the solution of 1 x 15 not an option? Does this account for the reason 3 x 5 was the solution 48% of the time?

very interesting

When something is completely understood it can be explained in the simplest terms. I will continue to do research. Because I don't understand what it is for. It seems to be a really fast calculator. What is their projected goal?

I am guessing that qbits are use in super-impose states to compute all possibilities at once... but to get the answer out of the super-impose states do you need an operation which will make the answer you are looking for come-out? Can someone give an example?

Does it have a cathode ray tube output?

the qubit can be represented as a 0 or 1 or a superposition of (10). the best analogy is if you imagine a red door as a 0 or closed and a green door as 1 or open ..in classical computation these are the only doors available to use. in the quantum computer there is also a yellow door the superposition. let's imagine a maze of rooms with three doors. in order to make the best progress through the maze all the doors must lead to a solution ... however in the classical computer the doors can only be opened one at a time I.e red door blue door blue door red door. in quantum computer a yellow door is available as a tool to check both doors at once... so you have a headstart as each door is open the rate at which you progress thru the maze is n to the power of 2. this exponential trait is what sets quantum computers apart from classical dual bit computers as the function of the superposition ( yellow door ) which is not available to classical computers allows a quantum speed up. the example above denotes a single qubit however as you add more and more qubits the function of n to the power of 2 is multiplied by the number of cubits.

weeeird dude i am pretty sure 3x5=15 100% of the time

Dont our brains work like quantum computers?

whats the starting sound? its pretteh chill m8-

3*5=15 40%!

this might be a stupid question, but does the success rate go down when the input number is larger?

The purpose of the horrible distracting shit music is?

Lotto uses the same computing vector of 15. This took me less than a min to fig out. 0 thru 9 from dust to ash. Think about that for a moment.

most overhyped technology ever.

I must say, it was lot of money/time spent for 48% probability. Best wishes !

What if your device is working just fine and quantumly speaking? 48% of the time the results are indeed 3 and 5. 52% of the time it is 1 and 15 and -3 and -5

Fascinating.

Why they don't use AI like DeepMind to solve the programe to run the quantum computing?
If using human itself to programme such things, it's gonna take time.

not gonna lie, was down with the intro music

Just... please make sure there's one in my phone for encryption before there's one at GCHQ or the NSA listening to my phone. Ta.

What good is a computer where it gives a right answer (prime factors or whatever) 50% of the time and wrong answer 50% of the time? Sounds like just guessing is just as effective and far cheaper.

If the algorithm works on a digital computer already what is the significance of 3x5 = 15 with a 52% error, nothing ground breaking here

Im assuming that the times it produces a different answer that thats due to the qbits not behaving as they should? Meaning that eventhough theyve supercooled and evacuated the chamber that some outside influences are still affecting the subatomic particles?

In my imaginings of better computing, I always thought that a knowledge base in 3D space, would become the standard. It would contain all of mankind's knowledge to date. A clone of Artificial Intelligences would have it as their base.

But something I was reckoning on was 3D positioning could effect things by the interactions of actual electro/magnetically at some static level, would influence each other... but I did fail to say at the beginning this was for AI in 3D space... with the concept put forth that all knowledge has its place in logic compared to all other knowledge. And therefore would have its best positioning in 3D structure, a bit like a brain, but better. As it can be logically "wired" before it is designed to mass produced by machine into the solid unit. That is it evolves a Virtual add on for all its learning, so that in the next major upgrade, all of the AI's combine their data, so all get the new upgrade, either virtually or in the 3D mass produced new base model.

Then again, it could be colours and crystals at some point, making binary a fraz of billions of colours...

A quick update from 2017, we are at 2000 qubits with D-Wave's 2000Q :D

man i wish i had this kind of intelligence and know how..

« And then we cool it down to almost absolute zero » wtf does absolute zero even mean?

That fidget spinner t-shirt

so modest....

Pocket size version any day now?

Your bank balance is only $15. But only 48% of the time? This is going to make accounting difficult!

If you have to "verify" the result using a traditional computer then you will have a problem. Consider Gödel's incompleteness theorems -- if you can solve a problem with a quantum computer that same problem will not be solvable on a traditional computer. If a quantum computer is only "sometimes" correct then you will never be able to verify an quantum answer by checking it on a conventional computer.

Hypothetically (?), the self-organization of the Quantum Fields Mechanism, is what atomic structures in the Standard Model and Periodic Table are, all resonant summed history, phase-locked together in chemistry and physics, and are arranged according to the languages of mathematics in our perceptions to behave in particular "computed" ways of psudo-randomness. Ie if we can remove the "noise" of the annealing process, then a predetermined result of superposition will match the actual state output by the device, ("The Babbage accuracy of construction problem").

It's the ultimate parallel processing by design using an effect similar to the growth of spacetime-elemental grains (of primes) in crystal-coordinate resonance?

Sum of all histories, now to now=>eternal constant/resonance.

If the analog computation, (another name for an analogy by simplified comparison), is continued, then it's the readout of results that is the determining factor, (literally), of a successful operation, and so the methods and devices used in MRI, tuned to the desired range of solutions, is critical? (And possibly a compound set of scanning frequencies like WiFi in reverse..)

It's analogous to the "hard problem" of mind in body, because it's a phase-locked distribution of QM-Time, Q-chemistry by Fields Modulation Mechanism e-Pi-i resonance embodiment. If coherence is disturbed, the content in context connection goes very wrong, because the singularity synchronisation of the Quantum principle is also the Quantum Operator of the Exclusion Principle.

The nearest "device" analogous to the imagined operations of a Quantum Computer is possibly emulated by Human Savants, and that seems to be based on intense focus and vast memory storage with bio-logical Random Access (?)
If structures, =events, within the Universe are resonance grains of spacetime, and bio-logical organisms are integrated multi-oscillator quantum information computation, insect colonies are hive-mind distributed computation, then brain-body organisms are integrated cellular hive-mind, up to the levels of self-recognition and "consciousness".
Everything is phase-locked in resonance and timing spacing coherence/exclusion of cofactor-primes, AM-FM phenomena.

One Multiverse ghost of coherence in one Quantum Computational Machine?

if we seek the prime factors of N = p x q,
“N equals post wrong question” can’t seek a “prime n quick” solution with no me in we.
no equal prize nor request for prime n priwe then → pri
the answer is pri

Fuck im dumb.

Is there time frame?
Will there be possibility of total waste of time and energy?

"I have been working about 5 years to factor 15" :D

We're on our way, I say.

Remember, the first models of our Computer was just like this. One computer required one room, it was only able to compute numbers and nothing else, it has a separate room for the CPU, it's loud, it takes more than one person to make a computer work before. People thought it was impossible to finish. But not anymore.

With quantum computers, we are doing the same thing again, but more ambitious.

15=6 112358134711236915

You can't make a transistor smaller . Keep the transistor of small size and increase the chip area

What do we not know that a quantum computer could tell us?

👍

I can't imagine the feeling of that guy when everyone started clapping... as if all of his unsure work was finally validated.

can we visit the google quantum computer in santa barbara ?

That's it? Nothing about how you used Shor's Algo to get to 15 = 3x5??? Well that was disappointing =(

I get that it's a massive achievement to do that in a quantum computer, but I was hoping for a more indepth analysis / explanation of how you were able to get there. The Math. How the processor reached an equalibruim state. How you used a series of processes. This still seems like magic and wishful thinking to spend all this time trying to get a quantum computer to evaluate a complex system and have it spit out a result that may be 50% correct.

Rick