Divception: HTML Output Compared For Oxygen, Beaver Builder, Elementor

Divception: HTML Output Compared For Oxygen, Beaver Builder, Elementor

Oxygen

6 лет назад

8,310 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@rob5381
@rob5381 - 27.04.2022 12:48

I always thought page builders were great until I got told different from performance experts.

Ответить
@bhalesh
@bhalesh - 13.11.2020 22:36

You did not mention these 3 bad things about Oxygen:

1. All the content is wrapped in shortcodes. So just like other builders are doing Divception, Oxygen is doing shortcodeseption.


2. Dozens of most popular WP plugins are not compatible with oxygen builder.


3. Users have to buy expensive oxygen builder addons from 3rd party to do things which other page builders help in doing without any addons.

Ответить
@mmb4896
@mmb4896 - 20.05.2020 15:40

four levels of divception deep

Ответить
@brockdinbarr
@brockdinbarr - 20.09.2019 10:55

There is some logic behind a lot of themes that have "divitis" that is being overlooked - it's called cross-platform usability. I'd be interested to look at Screenshots of all of these on Safari, Firefox Mac/Win, Chrome Mac/Win and various mobile devices. That would be a true test.

Ответить
@romanr7948
@romanr7948 - 09.07.2019 06:25

If you look at raw source code as opposed generated code, you will see that pretty much the entire site is build by JavaScript in the browser. That makes me suspicious about SEO of sites built by Oxygen and other Wordpress builders.

Ответить
@humanyoda
@humanyoda - 08.07.2019 07:27

It's been a year. Does Oxygen still output clean, minimal code?

Ответить
@humanyoda
@humanyoda - 08.07.2019 05:18

And with so few divs Oxygen is capable of building responsive pages? It doesn't use a grid library?

Ответить
@humanyoda
@humanyoda - 08.07.2019 04:51

Are sites built with Oxygen compatible with all browsers used these days (except for those with tiny market share)? Flexbox is pretty new, isn't it?

Ответить
@josevalentin3990
@josevalentin3990 - 25.05.2019 16:35

I just got Oxygen and I love it. Took me a moment to wrap my head around but the training videos and Facebook community help me get a better understanding of this tool. I'm building a new client site with it and so far so good. Love the way it looks. Currently using bits and pieces of reusable elements from various templates but I am having fun modifying those elements to my will.

Great platform. I still use Divi but I will use that for my lesser paying clients.

Ответить
@craigblain2089
@craigblain2089 - 15.05.2019 03:08

Love this video! Luis' raw emotional honesty conveys my feelings about these alternative builders!

Ответить
@hypermatrix8999
@hypermatrix8999 - 09.05.2019 04:18

As much as I like Oxygen, this video was not done correctly. You used columns in the other 2 builders, but used horizontal stacking in Oxygen. You should have used columns in all of them, to give an actual representation of how they handle code to perform the exact same task.

Ответить
@CarlosVelascoPH
@CarlosVelascoPH - 31.01.2019 10:30

I think those BB and Elementor or whoever guys can come up with the same clean code. There must be a reason why they have all those HTML tags in there. For example, compatibility with older browsers like IE 8, IE 10, etc, not to mention different mobile browsers.

Ответить
@pxman1946
@pxman1946 - 18.01.2019 14:00

Isn't the massive difference simply due to Oxygen using flex-box ? And if so, then is Oxygen backward compatible with old browsers (for corporates etc?)

Ответить
@jgar1124
@jgar1124 - 05.01.2019 18:35

ouch!

Ответить
@websexpress4325
@websexpress4325 - 14.12.2018 23:29

Hhahahahhhahahahaha

Ответить
@ilonautriainen6977
@ilonautriainen6977 - 26.11.2018 22:18

Do you know How good Oxygen's responsive build is? Are you able to do adjust to specific devices ie from mobile range to tablet range? Are you able to adjust each section individually as a responsive element?

Ответить
@robertturner1550
@robertturner1550 - 25.11.2018 18:51

Very impressive. I'm going to build a couple sites with Oxygen and Toolset.

Ответить
@sugumar278
@sugumar278 - 24.11.2018 13:50

Very clean explanation! I like your oxygen builder clean codes! Add more features on oxygen builder! Thanks

Ответить
@diyseo
@diyseo - 28.09.2018 18:56

whoa careful with the swears

Ответить
@essare108
@essare108 - 28.09.2018 02:42

oh ive been a coder and architect - and I got exactly what you pointed out... damn i like oxygen more over elementor now :D

Ответить
@YorgoKastri
@YorgoKastri - 16.09.2018 10:04

im definitely in! after 3 years of VC aka backery... backed my head and time to long

Ответить
@profitglen5115
@profitglen5115 - 07.09.2018 17:58

I can't believe that professionals are on here cussing.

I fucking love it. Glad to see that you guys are just regular people too.

Ответить
@sbfotome
@sbfotome - 06.09.2018 10:10

This is so true, but I'm still laughing at the voice overs...

Ответить
@lonewolf7_
@lonewolf7_ - 31.08.2018 14:07

Amazing comparison video. After creating a dozen websites with elementor and beaver builder, I never really compared their code in such detail. You have undoubtedly convinced me on Oxygen builder's superiority.

Ответить
@JoeOracoy
@JoeOracoy - 25.08.2018 01:31

HOLY S%#^! Never have seen a pagebuilder code as clean as this! SERIOUSLY! As A front-end dev, this is eyes watering lol I thought it can't be done but damn. You guys at Oxy are pretty damn good! I bet with this one its pretty damn lightweight. Do you have a Trial by any chance?

Second question, no problem with this on a local staging environment right(xampp)?

Ответить
@metalattackdotcom
@metalattackdotcom - 17.08.2018 06:14

What is the real impact in time? Does it affect SEO onpage?

Ответить
@prateek1703
@prateek1703 - 02.08.2018 18:30

wpbakery/ visual composer has the same issue right?

Ответить
@Neceros
@Neceros - 24.07.2018 10:27

I was with you until you started shit-talking competitors. I agree with everything you said, but it looks low-class on a professional video. This topic is very important to me and may even sway who I use when I use a page builder. Oxygen seems like it's quickly becoming top brand, but you gotta lose the salt.

Ответить
@BjarneOldrup
@BjarneOldrup - 20.07.2018 20:56

What an eye opener. Thanks for not polluting the web with all those divs and spans ;)

Ответить
@chrisb5823
@chrisb5823 - 11.07.2018 21:56

Just bought Oxygen without even knowing this - wow that's just insane. And yes I have clients that look at this stuff so it's always embarrassing when you're asked "wth is all this?" Can't wait to get into using Oxygen.

Ответить
@robertoinnocenzi3626
@robertoinnocenzi3626 - 06.07.2018 05:43

WoW very impressive !!!
What about the new page builder called Brizy ?

Ответить
@Nelmedia
@Nelmedia - 25.06.2018 06:38

Good point...

Ответить
@scullie83
@scullie83 - 21.06.2018 15:23

Holy fucking divception LOL

Ответить
@NezamUddin
@NezamUddin - 20.06.2018 22:13

What about Divi? I thought this video was about Divi Builder!

Ответить
@robertshepherd7288
@robertshepherd7288 - 20.06.2018 21:56

Crap....you're making a compelling argument! And I just bought Elementor a month ago. You're highlighting what has bugged me for years is how crazy devs get with their embedded DIVs. I'll have to give Oxygen a try because it looks like it can replace my page builder and maybe even my framework.

Ответить
@CiaowebCoUk123
@CiaowebCoUk123 - 20.06.2018 18:41

From the code output point of view Elementor and Beaver Builder look prehistoric compared to Oxygen. I trusted this excellent WordPress site builder since version 1.

Ответить
@maxziebell4013
@maxziebell4013 - 20.06.2018 15:18

Nice slapdown!

Ответить
@imraan_alam
@imraan_alam - 20.06.2018 12:54

where i can get oxygen trial

Ответить