Комментарии:
Best channel!
ОтветитьNike Vomero 5 my friend
ОтветитьGreat review! Even with all the "innovations" of the ultraboost over the years, I still find the original (now DNA) version to be the best. It's just a perfect formula that needs no changes to be amazing. A classic for a reason!
Ответитьthat's a firm boost
ОтветитьDamn. I guess I should pick up 22's over these
ОтветитьGreat review
ОтветитьThe UL’s are listed as 293g
Ответитьneed a new mic, it will increase overall production quality.
ОтветитьAdidas, designed by women to crush men's toes 🤣
Ответить"too much of a running shoe"
damn that's crazy, runners will say the opposite
also 30% lighter boost not shoe
how's the width compared to the ultraboost 22? The 22 was just too narrow but these look wider. do they feel wider?
Ответитьterrible call for adidas to stick with the same design. so tired of the ub 21/22 look
ОтветитьThanks for the review. I'm considering buying an Ultraboost shoe for everyday lifestyle use, which involves a lot of walking as I rely on transit to get around. I visited my local Adidas outlet and found the Ultraboost 22, Ultraboost Lite and X_PLRBoost all heavily discounted and priced similarly.
The Adidas outlet rep recommended the Ultraboost Lite (which she was wearing), while ChatGPT suggested the Ultraboost 22.
I’d love your recommendation on which one to buy and why?
they should move some of the heel foam to the forefoot.
10mm drop, that weird bulbs inside, tight toes and the upper is heavy and too closed🤦the plastic propulsion are good but make it stiff. Too expensive to have so many flaws... I want something more sleek with the new foam, why the can't do uppers like Puma Nitro line up or nike pegasus