Комментарии:
Speedy trial means maybe before you're dead and buried, but not likely.
ОтветитьSo as it stands, nothing has changed and it is still up for review when they get around to looking at it at a conference sometime in the future
ОтветитьThe Supreme Court needs to grow a pair. Semi -Autos are not Assault weapons . End of Story. Every body knows this, Why keep doing the same Democrat Dance. Come on Get With it🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
ОтветитьThe Supreme Court needs to be completely replaced. They are corrupted and incompetent.
Ответить"Living under these laws" includes people spending more time incarcerated for violating these unconstitutional laws. I'm sure that if it affects a family member of one of the justices or someone in the political class, they would have already addressed the issue.
ОтветитьReally this is breaking news! Just more kicking the can down the road. The SCOTUS has had over 30 years to over turn Assault weapons and magazine bans. And Bruin has yet to do anything at all for us. It will never matter if they don’t take any cases on those grounds. Get real people history proves they are not going to anything!!!!
ОтветитьWhen my boss comes to me Monday and asks me to do my job, I'm going to tell him not this time but come back next Monday and we'll look at it again and maybe or maybe not....the system is a joke do you damn job
ОтветитьI'm an FFL in Illinois....Barely still under Pritzkers crooked bans....PLEASE HURRY THE F*CK UP SCOTUS !
ОтветитьTaxation is extortion. Government is slavery.
ОтветитьThis was a useless update that could easily have been included in a weekly summary video instead of a click baiting "breaking news" update.
ОтветитьPlease stop putting Breaking News. It’s just a update. Breaking News is when us Californian win our gun rights back
ОтветитьOne simple solution to all these state gun prohibitions:
The U.S. Attorney General can sue states over laws. This happens when the federal government believes that a state law violates federal law or the U.S. Constitution. The Attorney General can file a lawsuit in federal court to challenge the state law and seek to have it invalidated.
These types of lawsuits are based on the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law.
The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, is a cornerstone of the American legal system. Here are the key points:
1. Federal Law Supremacy:
• The Supremacy Clause establishes that the U.S. Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are "the supreme Law of the Land."
• This means that federal law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions.
2. Binding on State Judges:
• State judges are bound by the Supremacy Clause, meaning they must follow federal law when there is a conflict with state law.
• Even if state laws or constitutions conflict with federal laws, state judges are required to uphold federal law.
3. State Law Invalidity:
• When there is a direct conflict between federal and state law, the state law is rendered invalid.
• This ensures a unified legal system and prevents states from enacting laws that undermine federal authority.
4. Preemption Doctrine:
• The clause is the basis for the doctrine of preemption, where federal law can supersede or "preempt" state law in certain areas.
• There are two types of preemption:
o Express Preemption: When a federal law explicitly states that it overrides state law.
o Implied Preemption: When state law is invalid because it conflicts with federal law or interferes with federal objectives.
In essence, the Supremacy Clause ensures a cohesive legal framework across the United States by asserting the dominant authority of federal law over state laws and constitutions.
I’ve been saying since day one of these cases supreme Court doesn’t have the stones to take them up, the second amendment is treated as a second hand right any other infringement on an amendment would have already been taken up and decided on.
ОтветитьThe scotus is fuckin useless to uphold the 2A , they will vote against them , watch , then each state controls it own laws on gun control like here in Washington State , so it don't matter what scotus says sooooooo useless
ОтветитьThe Supreme court has become useless,and all these blue states snub their noses at their rulings anyways.
ОтветитьI had so much fun back in the 80s. We didn't have cell phones back then, but We did have the freedoms to have high capacity mags & 100 rd drums and Russian ammo that was extremely cheap, and you could buy two big size sardine stile cans full of Russian ammo in a wood crate for $105.00 You could also buy a Russian semi automatic kalishmikov AK-47 for only $290.00 which came with two 30 rd mags & a 100 rd drum if you paid $59.00 dollars more. I'd spend 90 percent of my paycheck on guns & ammo almost every week and me and a bunch of friends would pile in my muscle car and go to an open range in lytle Creek california. Those were definitely the funnest times to have firearms you could buy awesome weapons back then in California. California has definitely become a communist socialist state. The 2nd ammendments have definitely been neutered to almost taken away because of ignorant people that don't hold criminals accountable for their crimes, instead they blame the guns for the crimes. There's absolutely no common sense anymore. Trump will hopefully bring back common sense to all these ignorant governors that are destroying our God-given freedoms to bare arms. Save California, stop voting for demon-crats.
ОтветитьI wish the Supreme court would either declare that "strict scrutiny" is required or that ANY weapon the police have, the citizens must be allow to have.
ОтветитьWe need to get Elon into Firearms then things might move faster
ОтветитьThank God they saw fit to take up the TikTok case over our 2A rights... Unbelievable.
ОтветитьComment for the Algore-Rythmn
Ответитьmuch to do about nothing
Ответить😂😂 you rarely have any real news lol always just updates on cases.
ОтветитьIt’s so crazy to me that these clowns can just push these down the road, BUT when it’s something THEY want answered or passed, it’s done right then and there. Such a f’d up system.
ОтветитьDude, please just stop already. There is "no breaking news" and nothing has changed.
ОтветитьI'm starting to think you are mocking us! 😂
ОтветитьFederal Judges are quick to stop Trump but are slow to safeguard the Constitution.
ОтветитьIt seems to me that all the time the Supreme Court spends kicking things down the road, they could get a lot more things accomplished if they were actually in session. The whole process seems to be convoluted, hyper expensive and dysfunctional. In many ways. I understand there's probably thousands upon thousands of casesthat had toward the Supreme Court on a regular basis. I also understand that according to our constitution, something has to be decided on every case that appears before court. Why does the Supreme Court get an exemption from this?
Ответитьthis is not major breaking news. I stopped watching Armed Scholar for the exact reason. Every video was the most incredible earth shattering, world changing, unbelievable, breaking news and you waste over 10 min to find that NOTHING at all happened (also he's SO boring and at least you are not). You are starting to do the same thing though and I'm pretty close to unsubscribing.
ОтветитьGood news for a start.
ОтветитьGood news or bad news, you are my go to for updates. Appreciate you bro.
ОтветитьShall not be infringed is pretty clear to me, its a shame that the traitors in our Government can't seem to grasp that simple concept 😎
ОтветитьDenied a GVR case mean's
the lower courts have the real power.
The SCOTUS are just a bunch of hacks in black robes
The SCOTUS GVR a case the lower courts reply with a suck it!!!
ОтветитьDoes anybody else smell a rat?
ОтветитьThe SCOTUS is not going to do anything. They have had over 30 years to take assault weapons and magazine ban cases. They will send the case back down or reject them outright. The government is playing the long game. They know In one more generation Americans will mostly just ask to have their guns taken away. They are nearly there now. So they are just trying to slow the process down until that point.
ОтветитьThis isn't "breaking news"
ОтветитьDid you know tRump's record in 2016 on guns was dogshit? Enjoy being pandered to, suckers.
ОтветитьSCOTUS will punt. It’s what they do.
ОтветитьA snail could cross this country & back again before a final ruling would take place on one of the most basic rights denied to millions of Americans!
ОтветитьBlah Blah Blah la Blah.
ОтветитьWhen they actually give you an answer then put breaking news. You keep telling us what we already known for for awhile now.
Ответить❤
ОтветитьHopefully with the new administration, the "gun control" discussion will change
ОтветитьGood news overall
ОтветитьI believe the Supreme Court keeps denying all these major 2A cases because they believe in not to distant future that most of our societies population will adopt a European style anti gun stance.
So they keep punting the cases down the road till then, knowing that if they ruled on it now, they would have to uphold the 2A..
I mean do you see any other reasoning here? I could be wrong, but this is only reasoning I can come up with
For the record---it is noted that the Supreme Court has prioritized the issue of offensive books in school libraries (Mahmoud v. Taylor) over the Second Amendment. Huge shame.
Ответить🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👏👏👏
Ответить“Breaking News” More “Breaking News”
Ответить