New Metro rail line approved

New Metro rail line approved

County of Los Angeles

2 года назад

20,714 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@KRMKTWN
@KRMKTWN - 21.04.2022 15:09

Before 2043... 😐

Ответить
@Mario-by2xc
@Mario-by2xc - 22.04.2022 06:13

“New rail line” 😀
“It’ll be completed before 2043” 😕
“it’s light rail” 😣

What.the.hell Metro

Ответить
@marcospintor1333
@marcospintor1333 - 26.04.2022 19:20

I’ll be 44 years old. I’ll own a house and have a family.
Definitely not in los angeles of course 😂

Ответить
@xcelron1580
@xcelron1580 - 11.05.2022 09:59

This is the most anticipated line I'm looking forward too, the getaway cities badly need this to deal with over congestion of cars. I'll finally be able to go straight to DTLA without multiple transfers.

Ответить
@hugo5086
@hugo5086 - 11.05.2022 11:23

You do not triumphantly hold a press conference in 2022 to announce a light rail line will be finished by 2043! It's a light rail it's not even a Subway why does it take this long ridiculous!!

Ответить
@user-vj8tc3vg1m
@user-vj8tc3vg1m - 12.05.2022 10:15

「Bing翻訳」を利用してロサンゼルスのB線とD線(地下鉄)の動画を見ていたら、関連動画にGoogleによって自動翻訳されて「新しいメトロ鉄道が承認されました」と出てきたので見てみました。見た感じ何かしらの貨物鉄道会社の線路?の上に高架で建設したり、道路上に併用軌道で路面走行区間を設けたりするみたいですね。

Ответить
@flamingvans1135
@flamingvans1135 - 14.05.2022 06:15

Normally, it wouldn't take that long. But they're having to do construction through built-up areas, and they've got to factor in unexpected problems as they're laying the tracks, mainly, the wailing and whining of property owners along the right of way. They never should have torn up the Pacific Electric and LAMTA tracks in the early 60's, but what's done is done.

Ответить
@areguapiri
@areguapiri - 27.05.2022 09:04

Dumb people wearing ri.diculous m.asks.

Ответить
@rexlee2659
@rexlee2659 - 30.05.2022 21:46

LMAOOO 2043

Ответить
@benchis311
@benchis311 - 01.06.2022 01:24

Line 3 in Guadalajara about the same size as this one took 7 years to build

Ответить
@jg-7780
@jg-7780 - 02.06.2022 08:46

If I understand correctly, the “before 2043” comment is referring to an old timeline that assumed only one funding source (measure M) for all of LA’s transit projects, which placed this project as completing in 2043.

However, metro & the city are pursuing additional funding options, which should push that opening date to the early-mid 2030s. This is what I believe she meant by “before 2043.”

Still annoyingly long, but not 22-years-long

Ответить
@JamesDavis-mb1jw
@JamesDavis-mb1jw - 14.06.2022 23:03

🤣🤣🤣
While they expand, usage declines.

Ответить
@djroach3237
@djroach3237 - 20.06.2022 19:05

What a shame! L.A. public transportation is a huge embarrassment to other major cities all over the world!
R.T.D. should have never sold out to MTA!!!

Ответить
@coolnewpants
@coolnewpants - 26.06.2022 20:51

Why is she so hyped about a project that won't be done until 2043? That's 21 years! Jesus

Ответить
@intreoo
@intreoo - 01.07.2022 02:22

I don't understand the current time scales for these projects.

The Metro E line from DTLA to Santa Monica (15.2 mi) took 6 years to build (2006 - 2012). The West Santa Ana Branch Corridor from Union Station to Pioneer (19.3 mi) will take 20 years to build (2023 - 2043).

If WSAB was built at the same rate as the E Line, it would only take 7.6 years to complete. Not to mention that both the E line and WSAB are the same type of light rail. In fact, the E Line should've taken longer because most of it had to be built elevated in a dense environment. WSAB will literally be built majorly on long stretches of flat clear land that have been empty for decades, and yet it will take 20 years; the earliest opening at that.

What happened?? Is there a shortage of workers, did wages rise, is climate change slowing progress; why is it taking so long? I don't want to sound like I'm nagging, but I really don't believe it should take 20 years to build this.

Ответить
@alq8879
@alq8879 - 31.07.2022 08:16

under/over this finishes 5 years behind schedule

Ответить
@deebte__
@deebte__ - 02.08.2022 00:47

it's gonna take 21 years because they probably won't even start construction until past 2030 and metro is slow af, approval just means they've confirmed that they're gonna do it, doesn't mean they have any funding yet

Ответить
@davidlang1125
@davidlang1125 - 03.08.2022 10:01

2043?!?!?!?!
A lot could happen between now and then.
This is the sad state of affairs in transit planning in the US. Lack of commitment, lack of political support, lack of political cojones and lousy planning.
So the proposed route will go through industrial no-man’s land. Great!
Instead integrating the line with forward thinking city planning this line is just another half baked proposal that will never fulfill expectations. It’s another missed opportunity to integrate housing, retail and services around the stations with good walking qualities that will get people to live without cars.
This is just a great disappointment to transit and urban planners who want to see more constructive solutions for our cities. The planners here did the easy way of doing transit. They ignored everything else. Another mediocre project.

Ответить
@european51
@european51 - 04.08.2022 22:07

Why not invest in a cirle line that goes around LA, I suggest the Gold Line going to Ontario International Airport

Ответить
@inosurrender8327
@inosurrender8327 - 09.08.2022 04:36

Should be done before 2030 at the very latest

Ответить
@skatingdonefurther3063
@skatingdonefurther3063 - 07.09.2022 05:52

At least LA County doin somethin about their transit. No matter how long it takes. Riverside County doesn’t truly improve anything.

Ответить
@xavpg
@xavpg - 14.09.2022 18:05

2043 are you kidding me?

Ответить
@jia7302
@jia7302 - 18.09.2022 08:32

When she said before 2043😂😂😂😂😂

Ответить
@cleanbeanlalo3641
@cleanbeanlalo3641 - 10.10.2022 05:46

I Will Die With All This Violence In LA County Before This Is Completed Hahahah What A Joke

Ответить
@moishglukovsky
@moishglukovsky - 10.10.2022 14:06

“Supervisor’s.” FFS.

Ответить
@Risky2k9
@Risky2k9 - 13.10.2022 02:44

We''ll be all 80 years old or dead by the time this project is done. Thanks Metro !

Ответить
@lac2275
@lac2275 - 30.10.2022 14:35

Before 2043? Wow, sometimes I can't believe America is supposed to be the world power when inefficient projects like this show up. In China they would have built this line in a few years.

Ответить
@anthonysnyder1152
@anthonysnyder1152 - 03.11.2022 01:31

Lol at the timeline. Ridiculous.

Ответить
@alexm5209
@alexm5209 - 23.11.2022 05:41

Why does it take that long to build?

Ответить
@keving1072
@keving1072 - 14.12.2022 21:32

I’m all for what ever gets people off the roads in our beloved city

Ответить
@lucaspadilla4815
@lucaspadilla4815 - 04.01.2023 05:49

more heavy rail rapid transit

Ответить
@HAL-bo5lr
@HAL-bo5lr - 07.01.2023 07:04

She said 2043. Which means the project should realistically & optimistically be completed by 2050. Wonderful. pEaK uRbAN deVelOpMent here people.

Ответить
@teriwood4946
@teriwood4946 - 24.01.2023 23:53

Hell ya baby

Ответить
@DDELE7
@DDELE7 - 30.01.2023 23:39

Has Los Angeles ever considered building a circle line to connect the surrounding LA area without having to change trains Downtown.

Ответить
@harutosunaa3881
@harutosunaa3881 - 31.01.2023 09:41

Meanwhile in Asia…

Ответить
@migjing23OCMCHS
@migjing23OCMCHS - 11.02.2023 20:00

Lol. 2043!? Rats I will be long dead before I can ride it. I would love to have riden it once. Train nerd.

Ответить
@portcybertryx222
@portcybertryx222 - 12.02.2023 00:17

2043 is this a joke?

Ответить
@GloryBeToGodForever
@GloryBeToGodForever - 11.04.2023 05:01

Before 2043? LOL! That year may never come. Jesus Christ is coming.

Ответить
@matthewandrew
@matthewandrew - 11.07.2023 23:48

2043

Ответить
@urfranz
@urfranz - 16.07.2023 08:39

Instead of lining the pockets of your friends, maybe invest in future proof mass transit like underground tunnels and build mass housing above

Ответить
@european51
@european51 - 15.10.2023 21:53

Why don't you extend The Gold Line to Ontario Airport would be such a blessing for the people here in the San Gabriel Valley nd surrounding areas.

Ответить
@the_menace_mike
@the_menace_mike - 18.11.2023 12:27

What a joke. Metro should be ashamed of itself

Ответить
@CancelYoutube026
@CancelYoutube026 - 17.12.2023 16:05

2043?! I will be moving to Seattle or San Fran before it even start constructing, LA people should really consider getting rid of their corrupted and inefficient officials.

Ответить
@horatiohuskisson5471
@horatiohuskisson5471 - 05.01.2024 20:40

When she said 2043, I thought it was a heavy rail project 😢

Ответить
@taizzle70
@taizzle70 - 14.01.2024 16:01

2043.... LOL! Make that 3043 sounds more realistic.

Ответить
@ricardochavez1625
@ricardochavez1625 - 28.01.2024 08:24

It's probably gonna take 10 years to build

Ответить
@ricardochavez1625
@ricardochavez1625 - 28.01.2024 08:25

They should start building in 2025 or 2026

Ответить
@zada9409
@zada9409 - 11.02.2024 00:18

Waymo's self-driving services will make millions of dollars from us Californians by 2043. Congratulations, LA Metro! Your flawed "West Santa Ana Branch trashcan project" will forever be a forgotten name in California, except for being recorded in the history of LA's corrupt bureaucracy in transportation.

Ответить
@jonathanrelatado5349
@jonathanrelatado5349 - 10.05.2024 09:12

Divert funding from highways into transit projects.

Ответить