Magnific Upscale + FREE Alternative!

Magnific Upscale + FREE Alternative!

Olivio Sarikas

6 месяцев назад

80,652 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@CrazyEyezAI
@CrazyEyezAI - 21.01.2024 01:57

I've tested both your workflow and Kijai's. I'd say yours is better for anime/cartoony type images and Kijai's is better for realistic.

I haven't found anything better for realistic than the CCSR workflow that Kijai dropped.

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@keylanoslokj1806
@keylanoslokj1806 - 20.01.2024 17:01

The problem is it's too expensive for an image maker. (,not true upscaler)

Ответить
@memkiii
@memkiii - 19.01.2024 23:42

Impressive stuff, but $1k per year. I think I'll pass on that. Your workflows look nice however.

Ответить
@alexgurevich9625
@alexgurevich9625 - 19.01.2024 20:03

Thank you so much for this labor. It is simply spectacular!!!

Is there any way to transfer the given workflow to Stable Diffusion? Or will it not be able to handle it the way ComfyUI does?

Ответить
@polotricks6373
@polotricks6373 - 19.01.2024 14:57

Your are THE MAN! Thanks.

Ответить
@emilioivars255
@emilioivars255 - 18.01.2024 23:11

THAT MAGNIGIFIC AI HAS AN INSULTING PRICE. THEIR CREATORS ARE GETTING RICH FROM OTHRS ARTISTIC JOBS. I NEVER WILL PAY 50$ A MONTH FOR AN AI AT THIS TIME OF HIS EVOLUTION. ITS INSULTING AND NOT FAIR AT ALL THAT PRICE.

Ответить
@jagsdesign
@jagsdesign - 18.01.2024 06:54

as usual awesome presentation and right to the point cool workflows

Ответить
@Thecroods923
@Thecroods923 - 17.01.2024 17:21

Customers are seeing this pricing 😂. Dont pay them 😂

Ответить
@theflowwizard
@theflowwizard - 17.01.2024 11:19

If you don't get paid for making this video then I will eat a broom

Ответить
@Lazarusart
@Lazarusart - 17.01.2024 11:04

Magnific is $39 pm !!!! Not a chance !

Ответить
@SirMadsen
@SirMadsen - 17.01.2024 09:06

What are those prices though? Not even worth to try.

Ответить
@jeffbull8781
@jeffbull8781 - 17.01.2024 07:39

I actually find the pricing of this quite offensive. Especially considering its literally an img2img sampler and upscaler looped many times (no doubt running on beefy huge gpus) but the price is outrageous, as its based on open source.

Ответить
@not_riley
@not_riley - 17.01.2024 07:12

lost interest as soon as i saw the prices. Those guys are nuts.

Ответить
@VincentClaudius
@VincentClaudius - 17.01.2024 01:58

No this is actually amazing 🔥🔥🔥

Ответить
@MarcsTutorials
@MarcsTutorials - 17.01.2024 00:18

Looking at the sample images on their website, this is basically nonsense. They change the anatomy of the faces calling it "upscaling". Their samples aren't better than (manually adjusted) Topaz "upscale" and those are useless for professional use (I have been working in print editing for a couple of decades now). This whole AI stuff is "mind boggling" but it is mostly "mind boggling bad". Eye candy, yes, but sugar doesn't help a rotten tomatoe.

Ответить
@UltraStyle-AI
@UltraStyle-AI - 16.01.2024 02:34

Having tried Magnific, I wasn't impressed by the quality. Maybe its better for photorealism. I used it on my own anime girls and actually got better results natively with the upscalers used in AI generation.

Ответить
@samaleksandrov9107
@samaleksandrov9107 - 16.01.2024 01:54

Great video, just found about you and immediately you have a new fan! By the way, if you hold Z, you can zoom in and out with your scroll wheel directly on the website :)

Ответить
@calvinnguyen1451
@calvinnguyen1451 - 16.01.2024 00:47

Awesome stuff @Olivio. Any recent updates that allow for ComfyUI and/or A1111 to run well on OSX with xformers enabled for faster render times?

Ответить
@user-hg2je1kh6e
@user-hg2je1kh6e - 16.01.2024 00:13

Do I need to download these upscale files in order to use this workflow?

Ответить
@makulVR
@makulVR - 15.01.2024 13:28

Looks like a regular (overpriced) upscaler to me! In the dark girl picture this upscaler alters the vibe of the picture completely because you can't use your loras. Unless you go for animals, landscapes, abstract art I would not use this tool at all.

Ответить
@Mobay18
@Mobay18 - 15.01.2024 12:48

magnific is a scam for that price. Nobody should pay that much for something that is basically a comfy UI workflow put into a website though a API.

Ответить
@xorq
@xorq - 15.01.2024 10:52

Can"t we achieve this with some workflow in comfyui ?

Ответить
@ponponych2
@ponponych2 - 15.01.2024 05:50

Если уж мы можем сильно отойти от оригинала, то проще сделать схему через IPadapter, чем прогонять через десяток Upscalers.

Ответить
@moviecartoonworld4459
@moviecartoonworld4459 - 15.01.2024 04:35

Your lectures are the best. Thank you always!

Ответить
@ladyrose358
@ladyrose358 - 14.01.2024 23:08

👍

Ответить
@xzendor7reproductions
@xzendor7reproductions - 14.01.2024 20:40

This is an amazing piece of software.

Ответить
@RealBrentYoung
@RealBrentYoung - 14.01.2024 17:44

Not an upscale people need to understand this.

People putting their photos through it thinking they own the end result. You remove copyright by doing this as it becomes an ai generated image regardless of your photo being used as the base

Ответить
@sb6934
@sb6934 - 14.01.2024 16:50

Thanks!!

Ответить
@Minotaurus007
@Minotaurus007 - 14.01.2024 16:33

@Olivio: ImageScaleDownToSize seems to work. I installed comfyui-art-venture under custom-nodes, but comfyui doesn't seem to find this important node. Any comment?

Ответить
@ghassenbenelhajamor1738
@ghassenbenelhajamor1738 - 14.01.2024 15:35

Excellent job

Ответить
@Dazreil
@Dazreil - 14.01.2024 15:16

The reason it’s all over twitter is because all the influencers talking about it are all friends with the founder Javi. I wonder if they all get free tokens? As others had said it’s a crazy price for what is img2img.

Ответить
@jakubkozak212
@jakubkozak212 - 14.01.2024 14:59

Dark UX patterns and misleading the user from the very beginning.
"Upscale your image" in their language means first give us your data (you cannot delete them later), then pay us monthly money, and then maybe we will allow you to upscale your image. I certainly do not recommend. Credits model with some free starters that other platforms offer is much better business model.

I would write it as an opinion under their offer, but there is no place to write opinion neither. This all put together says a lot about this company actually.

Ответить
@MagnesRUS
@MagnesRUS - 14.01.2024 14:25

Its look like multideffusion img2img with denoising st. 0.28-0.4 maybe with two steps
Conveniently made, but not worth the money. Now they don't even provide test images, so I don't see the point in using it. You can get about the same with A1111

Ответить
@jepperisum
@jepperisum - 14.01.2024 13:53

Thanks for all your work and content... I was blown away by this Magnific results when I saw it first a couple of days ago. This is exactly what I have been missing for ages, but I can't help thinking that it MUST be possible to replicate this with all the free tools there are available? The plans they offer for this "simple" service are insane imo.

Ответить
@nuejidub
@nuejidub - 14.01.2024 13:15

upscaling while changing the original image makes it hard to work with on a professional level.

Ответить
@Nojlink
@Nojlink - 14.01.2024 11:34

Wow, TOP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ответить
@Slen_
@Slen_ - 14.01.2024 11:29

Price wasn’t so much of a problem, I was ready to jump in until I read: 200 normal upscales & 100 large ones. So it’s limited! Even worst: they don’t even define what those normal and large upscales are prior to subscribing. Their FAQ don’t even explain the specs, resolutions etc. Too bad, the technology was impressive, thanks for this video 👋🏻

Ответить
@erikjohnson9112
@erikjohnson9112 - 14.01.2024 11:02

The MidJourney landscapes lost a lot of character, becoming bright happy images. Maybe more integrity could be retained with proper prompting. -- (talking about Magnific here, your upscales look more like the originals which I appreciate because the low-res images had some nice qualities)

Ответить
@user-yj3mf1dk7b
@user-yj3mf1dk7b - 14.01.2024 10:51

now upscale hands (where SD struggle the most) LOL
i bet their pipeline looks something like : interogate image -> split image into areas -> enchance -> upscale.
why i'm sure? cause foocus can into smth similar with inpainting but manually.

Ответить
@ISavant
@ISavant - 14.01.2024 10:42

or i can just not pay $40 for a pitiful number of img2img upscales, and use chainner to actually upscale, for free.

Ответить