ISOCELL Image Sensor: More pixels. More detail. | Samsung

I have a samsung A 52 with 64 MP rear camera the photos are just incredible compared to fold 4 50 MP I am using so more MP does matter

talk shat all day this is a real good advertisement. they even show the hardware part and high en production behind the seen part . they do not show a picture and video ad write real small additional equipment used. They literally show how they do it and it is still a good flex. good job samsung. good for you.

Hauwei is alway the king of top quality photography... Most people love lowlights photography

Samsung is king of pixel.. but no helpful 😪😪😴🥀

If the s24 ultra get a 108 or 200mp camera but with a larger sensor, then I'm gonna upgrade from the s22 ultra exynoss, this 200mp is just a gimmick, the sensor is way too small

전통을 이어받아 고양이를 거꾸로 달았어야

instant like for the cat

I don't understand these Ad's it's to show the quality of the video and image but the video is 1080P? Not 4K or 8K?

Where is the original photo sample with 200mpx resolution

Instead of making advanced things that fail, why don't they focus on making basic things that work and last?

Lol will the phone come with the adapter to attach that big lens they used for this. The smartphone will never accomplish that quality.

Let's first fix the shutterlag, overprocessing pictures, poor low light videography, crappy image stabilization.... gods sake just improve the ones you already have and invest more in your R&D, just imagine how many people wasted their money on an s20 with a ton load of issues

It's the sensor Who got the 12T pro?

I wonder how much those cat get paid

Is that will be on galaxy 23 ultra?

...And then I use my 2 yrs old Mi 10t Pro and make a better photo...(500 euros phone)

Meeeeooow!

ok, fine ... but what this nicely made ad is missing so badly is the fact that for truly large billboard size photography, there is no need for extremely high-res or large format film or digital sensors really! 🙂

why?

simply because for large size prints (especially from digital files) the PPI is set to 72 or even lower! in fact, even with film, billboard size posters can be made from 35mm originals, a trick that's been in use since ancient times ... but ok, yes, now many half-wit amateur photogs with little to no knowledge of how photography works (in general or in deep detail,) would surely fall for this and will probably exchange their fancy iPhones for the new Samsung toy ... (hint: Samsung lost the game in sensor technology to Sony and some others years ago actually ... at least in the DSLR market ...)

Why not just make a huge sensor at 20mp natively. No pixel binning or gimmicks. Just straight up bigger pixels at all times? This is my slight beef with what Samsung is doing. 200mp is highly unnecessary.

I would be surprised if the lens will come in the phone is sharp enough for 50mp. Don't get me wrong, 50mp is plenty sharp. Just the megapixel count isn't the limiting factor here.

They using a high end lens...right...that's not fair.

S23 ultra for sure

meow

RAW HDR?

What's the point of so many pixels if the night / low light videos look like you smeared 💩 on the sensor, thanks to them being ultra small and not being able to use binning ...

We want this camera in s23 ultra

cls very cool!

Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't... loving the camera experts in the comment section, come off as such pretentious mugs lol...

Might be the same sensor but clearly not the same lens nor aftertouch!

Please improve the video recording with very lowlight....!!!!

amazing💪😎

I'm not convinced that this 200mp sensor can produce same images with tiny smartphone lens as you showed with dslr lens. You will need a highly-highly resolving lens, otherwise it's just a mp propaganda like 108 mp.

That's great, i'm not a big fan of small sensors with high resolutions, but, i think that there are a lot of new technologies that can compensate those "bigger numbers" problems like pixel binning or, in certain situation, downsampling. That said, i also think that a great lens is better than an higher resolution sensor, so, i hope that with this new 200MPX sensor we will se a new generation of high quality glass, and maybe, also a faster aperture like F/1.5 that would help a little in low light situation (the comeback of a variable aperture would be great for landscapes photography). But i think one of the most important thing for this high end sensor is to get rid off the shutter lag, even with raw capture, please. Please also improve the others sensors in the S23 series, i would much prefer a smaller sensor for the 3x and 10x zoom but with higher quality glass and a faster aperture for lower light situation. Also a better stabilization will be helpful whlie filming in low light creating less artifacts. I'm using this comment like a feedback hoping that would be useful.

This is somehow missleading. First of all the images were taken in a controlled environment with plenty of light, by a person with experience. Secondly the subject chosen for the advertisment was probably chosen on purpose. While fur would be a good subject, yet a different subject with different texture, color (e.g. a parrot) would have been more difficult to shoot. Last but not least the image was properly processed. A normal guy/girl would struggle to obtain the same performance under tough lighting conditions. This is why is somehow missleasing. As a guy with some experience in photography we all know that a smaller pixel size in general comes with a lower sensitivity and is prone to noise. So 200Mpx in my eyes is really nonsense. I would prefer a 24 Mpx sensor with DSLR performance over a finger nail sized sensor with 200 Mpx crowded in a really small area.

I think they should stick with the current one and just perfect it
At this point (108mp) the pixels are not a weakness

Large format prints are actually really low in resolution because you’re seeing them from very far away. Most billboards are barely 2-3 megapixels in terms of resolution

Yes make the sensor size smaller and increse the megapixel count. Image will become more sharper & clear. Best of luck.

We don't need thousands of MP, we need good quality cameras and decent AI processing.

I don't need to zoom 2000 times in a smartphone picture, a smartphone picture must look good and must be quickly "snapp-able" just like with an iPhone or a Pixel.

I've had a hard time taking pictures with Samsungs over the S10, pictures are barely decent (expect for like a couple of situations where they look very good) and they take plenty of milliseconds to snap.

It sounds dumb but those milliseconds make the difference when taking a picture because it looks like the phone lags while processing it, and I even have to wait for it to fully process when I open the preview from the camera app.

More resolution also means that the phone has to process more data, thus slowing down the process.

lovely kitty

Please improve your lowlights and dynamic range too , don't make big only main sensor but other sensor is so small please share pixel to all lens too, i want to see super lowlights sensor and 50mp 15X optical zoom it will be Crazy 🔥🔥🔥
Sorry for my English 🙏❤️❤️

But not from a phone

I think it is also important to remember samsung are not aiming this at professionals.

Camera perfect
Sound perfect
Display amoled or super amoled
Touch panel is very fast.
Big battery..so i wish to Samsung company to
More then brand include do it the samsung S Serious

i am from sri lanka.
So My favorite brand samsung Galaxy S serious❤ only..and now used Samsung Galaxy S6..

Atleast Samsung is open to criticism

This is unbelievable😯

Please Samsung produce and sell a full frame sensor and start being a Sony sensors competitor

Impress me with a billboard-size print that holds up to viewing at arm's length, although I'm not sure what the point would be. You don't need incredible detail for a print you view from across a street. Marketing mythmaking.

Yeeeep with plastic optic lens in phone. Sure.

That detail is just😍😘

Just make good old 12mp with better technology