Комментарии:
They sound almost exactly like my boat engine 3 L MerCruiser four-cylinder
ОтветитьWhere can i find some decent quality car mods? The ones i get look so bleek
Ответитьgive the na a one a bigger cam and compression and redo the test. you basically just made a 662ci vs 331 ci test. boost basically doubles the displacement equivalent
ОтветитьHigh displacement V4 next?
ОтветитьWhy don’t more car makers do this? Would get fuel efficiency and horsepower, for the sacrifice of a smoother and better sounding car.. I would make that sacrifice just so long as it’s reliable and easy to maintain
ОтветитьBig block 4 cyclinder 😂😂😂
ОтветитьWhat's that UI app on the top that measures your quarter mile time called?
ОтветитьYou fucked over the turbo car in the standing mile. Shouldn’t have let that run even been in the video. Would’ve used a better run
ОтветитьI really enjoy the 1/2 V8 badge, it's quite amusing xD.
ОтветитьBut Why has the turbo engine 211hp without Turbo and the sc and normal Engine have Stock 277hp ?
ОтветитьThat Turbo logo reminds me of the Saab 900's one, love it
ОтветитьIf you add a well tuned supercharger it will feel like you have added a larger engine to your vehicle. The reason is a good supercharger (yes a procharger IS just another supercharger) should follow your N/A powerband fairly closely, only adding a torque/hp multiplier. There should not be any power spikes anywhere in the powerband. Blowers are notorious for their parasitic internal drag, which means that they will have to make extra boost to overcome this loss. Somthing else to note is blown engines consume large amounts of fuel because they make constant boost and need to be ran rich so that they don't burn up valves, pistons, etc.
If you add a properly tuned turbocharger to an engine it will respond naturally asperated until it comes into boost range. The reason: A turbo works by taking the extremely hot (less dense) exaust air from an engine and uses it to compress the cooler (more dense) intake air, the density difference between the chambers and the compressor profile are what allow the turbo to work. A set of waistgates allow excess pressure escape from the system, thus keeping the engine from overboosting. Since a turbos are exaust powered they don't boost up until the engine reaches a certain rpm, giving you turbo lag. A turbo's powerband will have a dead zone at the bottom, will spike up, then steadily climb from there. A turbo's variable boost is what gives turbocharged vehicles better fuel economy.
Even though it was not used in this video I feel like explaining it anyway. Nitrous Oxide Injection is considered the most dangerous form of boost mainly because it is an extremely "clean" form of boost meaning that the only notable change in a 50hp jet and a 300hp jet is the dyno graph. Folks get happy with the boost, send their engine to the moon, then complain about how dangerous nitrous is. N2O works by giving more oxygen to the combustion chamber. A wet plate setup adds extra fuel to the mix as well.
Now we get to my personal favorite! There ain't no replacement for displacement. A larger displacement engine literally has more room to make more power. Big c.i. N/A engines need to have optimised airflow through the heads. Other than that there is not much to them.
In Summary:
Superchargers are better suited to low RPM high torque demand applications
Turbochargers are better for higher RPM and constant torque demand applications
Nitrous Oxide Injection is best for sudden short term power applications
Big Displacement Natually Asperated engines are ideal when you have the space.
Twincharged version when?
ОтветитьIsn't the supercharger not yet in Automation ?
Ответитьlooks like the N/A and turbo cars were shifting gears at too high of a RPM, making the average power across each gear lower than it should have been
Ответить1/2 V8!! Love it
Ответитьi wish you could make your videos in metric aswell
Ответитьhey mustard how did you make the turbo diesel bastion car?
ОтветитьHoly hell that intro made me burst out laughing 😂it already sounds like absolute horse shit, now three of em together lol
Ответитьnow we need a TWIN CHARGED version
ОтветитьCould you possibly do a video for the suzuki baleno? Would like to see what my first car can pull in there
ОтветитьWhy does the supercharger get 21 psi and the turbo 18.8? Why not 21 psi for the turbo. Just asking.
Ответитьyou should add a big spreadsheet at the end of the video showing all the results kinda like project farm
ОтветитьBruh, the torque band in the lower RPMs of the turbo-4 big block just dropped on the standing mile run.
ОтветитьEcoboost hitting hard
ОтветитьWhat map did you use for the standing mile? Also, beautiful cars! When I first started watching the video I thought they were vanilla beam cars 😅
ОтветитьThis feels like a car Ford or GM would sell in south america and name it something like "Tupinambá".
Ответитьhmm sounds like a Toyota 2TR engine
ОтветитьNice
ОтветитьReminds me of GM 4.3 v6
ОтветитьAh yes, big block 4 banger. Absolutely piss poor bottom end but a top end so insane it'll knock ur socks off
ОтветитьAnxious to see the outcome of this battle!!!
ОтветитьThis is so ohio
ОтветитьSlightly unfair considering the N/A car revs higher and has 1 less gear, Wouldn't that throw the fuel economy tests out the window?
ОтветитьWhat about a Big Block V2?^^ Is it possible to design that in Automation?
ОтветитьHow did you put a blower into that?
Ответитьi would like to hear how such engine would sound like in Engine Simulator
ОтветитьHow did you supercharged the engine ?
ОтветитьCould you put the car on the repo please only if you can/ want ? 😅
ОтветитьWe need same test, but n/a 500hp engine.
ОтветитьNice test but miss the 500hp super N/A test
ОтветитьDo a big block V6 next
ОтветитьMake v4 engine
Ответитьearly, good to see the car getting used again
ОтветитьI was curious why the turbo and Supercharger models didn't have the same PSI of boost
ОтветитьFinally, a time in place where a supercharger is better
ОтветитьThese cars look really nice!
ОтветитьFirst
Ответить