Комментарии:
Corona is better for Archviz
ОтветитьVray is better no doubt, no one likes to have the virus because you know
ОтветитьHi, why is Corona Faster than Vray?
ОтветитьDoes corona support V-ray material??
ОтветитьAint nobody got time for this. D5 or Lumion for office production. Time is money, bitches.
ОтветитьIm recently start learn rendering in 3dsmax, first engine that i choose is Corona, for me which zero beginner, corona is complicated but commonly say Corona more simple than vray, wtf
ОтветитьNo doubting the quality of vray rendering. but when I finally switched away from mental ray, vray was way less intuitive and more awkward than learning Corona. If you're use to using vray and then switch to Corona, then it's not surprising that it can be a difficult transition. But if you haven't used either before, Corona is WAY easier to get into.
Ответитьwhat happened to Maxwell render?
ОтветитьCorona killed a family member :/. Vray ftw
ОтветитьAs a beginner Corona Renderer saved my ass.
ОтветитьLumion is taking all over the Arch Viz market. Chaos is not following the lead in this case, and a heavyweight game changer (Epic Games) is entering to the market with Twinmotion.
Ответить"corona's interface is a little bit more complicated compared to v-rays"
wtf you saying? are you crazy?
I love corona so much. I used Vray a lot but corona is so basic and simple
Ответитьhmm you show vray 3!??
ОтветитьEy ya cool !!!
ОтветитьYes not.
ОтветитьHmm... Havin corona isn't a bad thing after all.
ОтветитьCorona UI is more complicated than VRay UI ... sure sure... XD... LOL
ОтветитьCorona $25/month not a year lol. We could only wish.
ОтветитьHello blender community! i just uploaded my 3.5days long blender render, care to tell me your opinion ?
that video was a gem btw !
Lol I came hear after seeing the word corona name
ОтветитьMore render engine comparison should be on the way 🤗🤗🤗
ОтветитьWho will vote for Corona in 2020?? 😂😂😂
ОтветитьVray is awesome always
ОтветитьCorona has good GI compared to vray specially on interiors scenes. but vray is much more efficient when it comes to very heavy scenes.
ОтветитьI dunno what Vray is but Corona sucks
ОтветитьWHO?
ОтветитьThis video got tagged for corona LMAO
Ответитьhahaha corona covid and vray vacune
ОтветитьCan we use any of these engines in Blender? I would like to use them, they seem cool
ОтветитьIf a person written corona in the name of video you can see covid 19 in a blue box
ОтветитьNOT CORONA
ОтветитьYou should make a list or comparison with other render engines like Cycles, Arnold, Octane, Renderman, etc.
Ответить"Corona is more complicated......"
Ahhh... I see...
Well basically, the reason why the rendered image is good or bad is not about which render engine you use, but the skills of the artist itself...
ОтветитьNice one dude
Ответитьcorona is good because is more accessible to people buying it than vray
ОтветитьCan you make video about best book to learn modeling or to learn 3D or graphics❤❤
Ответитьof course Corona it was able to generate a global FAKE pandemic
ОтветитьMaterials. Do I have to use example Corona materials for Corona Render?
ОтветитьThe software is very very nice
ОтветитьAre the vray and corona addtions to 4D cinima, 3d max and maya ... or they r independent softwares ??
ОтветитьCan you make a video comparing the same scene in different render engines like vray, Arnold, cycles, corona, redshift, etc?
ОтветитьQualitywise I feel its slightly easier to get nice result quickly in corona but nw vray 5 is really good. For stills I think corona is better at times compared to vray. For sequences vray definitely has more control.
ОтветитьFor architects Corona is way much cheaper, easy. The splotches of vray in animation is still a major problem.
Ответить