X-47A Pegasus First Flight

X-47A Pegasus First Flight

AirMan454

17 лет назад

112,128 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@blueboby
@blueboby - 31.07.2008 19:11

this is ASS!! what are these assholes fucking thinking! they want to control the world!! fuck them

Ответить
@7paco
@7paco - 04.10.2008 21:53

is it usual for planes not to retract their landing gear on test flights?

Ответить
@abagnalejr123
@abagnalejr123 - 04.02.2009 12:15

Er, maybe the speed and AoA are a function of the fact that a: The first flight of any prototype is conducted with the gear DOWN, and as a result, the IAS has to be kept low to avoid overspeeding the gear, and b: Because the speed is low, the AoA has to be increased significantly to provide the required lift. This bird was obviously designed for MUCH higher speeds, where it would be MUCH more efficient (and hence the AoA would be most probably in the very low single figures or low negatives)

Ответить
@DouglasUrantia
@DouglasUrantia - 08.02.2009 01:10

Fair enough. Ok, what are they really hiding from us?

Ответить
@BradFieldMan
@BradFieldMan - 22.03.2009 19:43

nice lol!

Ответить
@helloman1976
@helloman1976 - 25.03.2009 22:45

They see UFOs that dont make any noise...this thing is super loud...

Ответить
@Ticonderoga444
@Ticonderoga444 - 15.04.2009 03:57

I said it before ill say it agin, "Americans you guys come up with the Koolst things! Keep it up :)"

Ответить
@cr9527
@cr9527 - 29.07.2009 23:23

US copied from Germans? You are telling me Germany had an unmanned, Carrier capable Stealth Drone... If not, then it is not a copy.

Ответить
@neverfearchrisishere
@neverfearchrisishere - 02.09.2009 02:42

All modern planes are designed to be aerodynamically unstable, they are able to fly through computers correcting the plane constantly to force it to do as the pilot wishes. This may seen like a farce, but allows planes to be awkward shapes (like stealth planes) or ultra maneuvarable (like the euro fighter)

Ответить
@shadowblade145
@shadowblade145 - 14.10.2009 03:01

Whew! That sure beats my remote controll piper cub by a little.....lol....

Ответить
@tekknoLuv4
@tekknoLuv4 - 18.01.2010 15:17

im pretty sure the b2, winged design, was 1st drawn up by German, in late 30's. and everything else, just took us that much to catch up. with the computers,.. yes to correct the flight paths. constantly being corrected.. ohh that euro fighter is nice. ;_)

Ответить
@cr9527
@cr9527 - 23.02.2010 21:14

The wing design of the German flying wings are quite different from the B-2.

Ответить
@afuturesoldier
@afuturesoldier - 14.03.2010 06:47

so were deploying another uav?

Ответить
@cr9527
@cr9527 - 10.04.2010 08:09

@123456789mischief And all copied the 1st ppl who made wheels, whoever they were :P

Ответить
@repsollenny
@repsollenny - 22.05.2010 17:26

Another UAV taking the chance for some human to become a pilot, sad, very sad...

Ответить
@hom3R1000
@hom3R1000 - 27.06.2010 20:21

Is that X-47A is flying over the Nevada desert, Groom Lake? (silly question)

Ответить
@ErnestoTani
@ErnestoTani - 12.07.2010 19:50

it was designed to operate on aircraft carriers?

Ответить
@cockyt4523
@cockyt4523 - 16.09.2010 05:30

@neverfearchrisishere its only JS fighters that are designed that way to give them the best dog fighting capability the likes of the B2 and B1B are not designed to be unstable

Ответить
@rock3tcatU233
@rock3tcatU233 - 19.09.2010 21:48

@cr9527 Americans don't do innovation, or even thinking. So it probably is a copy. :D

Ответить
@rock3tcatU233
@rock3tcatU233 - 19.09.2010 21:51

I think that they also forgot to copy the vertical stabilizer...

Ответить
@marsCubed
@marsCubed - 15.11.2010 18:46

@rock3tcat USA has the largest research & development programme on the planet, fully state funded & responsible USA's patent lead. AKA US-Navy research budgets. Paid for by American tax-payers, but handed over to private capitalists who are given the credit. Cold war propaganda scams still running, denying Americans social benefit of tax. for employment, innovation etc. Conserva-nuts put tax money into the Mil. to hide tax benefits from the population. It's a tactic AKA 'permanent arms economy'.

Ответить
@PistonAvatarGuy
@PistonAvatarGuy - 12.12.2010 23:52

@neverfearchrisishere All modern FIGHTER planes.

Ответить
@Luckzzz
@Luckzzz - 08.01.2011 22:12

If they release this video, it's shit right now. We have a lot more insteresting things. Like IFOs.

Ответить
@themossbackman
@themossbackman - 20.01.2011 22:02

I'm watching it on the history channel right now, they got no problem landing on an aircraft carrier.

Ответить
@DBSpy1
@DBSpy1 - 08.02.2011 23:20

I hear things like that fly overhead around 2am all the time, not much has changed since the 60s.

Ответить
@iceman27406
@iceman27406 - 18.02.2011 18:58

@StiviGun1 yeah it is to bad that the government droped the F/A 22 and the F35 is completely under powered they are trying to make it a jack of all trades that is why they are having so many damn problems and is going to be the main aircraft for the Army, Navy/Marines and the Air force and were selling them to foreign powers.as the old adage goes "Better to be a master of one trade then a jack of all."

Ответить
@reksub10
@reksub10 - 04.04.2011 05:58

so sad to see all that talent go into somthing pish like a weapon ,yep we humans a a fucking scourge

Ответить
@cr9527
@cr9527 - 17.06.2011 07:27

@juki0h Boohoo, how does that relate to a project over 4 decades later?

Ответить
@kirbyroxy
@kirbyroxy - 07.07.2011 05:58

@neverfearchrisishere the f22 and f16 are more maneuvarable than the euro fighter

Ответить
@kirbyroxy
@kirbyroxy - 12.07.2011 23:14

@neverfearchrisishere i have seen the f22 and f16 bolth fly in an air show and i say f22 also at the pairas air show (the bigies the f22 always wins) and they have things called stabalisers theys days

Ответить
@kirbyroxy
@kirbyroxy - 13.07.2011 00:14

@neverfearchrisishere i would rather have drones than be some shit contry that cant protect there selfs

Ответить
@2ndRCHAret
@2ndRCHAret - 15.09.2011 18:28

These new UCAV's are going to be the future. They can fly high risk missions with zero loss of life. Pull high G maneuvers that would kill human pilots. Remove a 180 pound pilot and add it as fuel or ordinance.

Ответить
@ThePatrickBateman69
@ThePatrickBateman69 - 13.03.2013 07:00

ITS A LODESTAR!

Ответить
@Spiderbro8
@Spiderbro8 - 27.05.2013 19:34

I believe the guy is referring to the technology behind the craft which was re-engineered by the Americans from the nazi technology at the end of WW2. The Arado Ar 234 as well as the messerchmitt 262 were the first jet engine powered aircraft ALSO the stealth design of a 'flying wing' was originally designed by the Germans for the Horten 229. The only reason Northrop Grumman develops such advanced aircraft today is because of the german scientists they recruited in Operation Paperclip

Ответить
@cr9527
@cr9527 - 28.06.2013 20:13

Stealth is relative. What is stealthy then, has virtually no bearing on current designs. By referring to the X-47 as a copy of the Germans because it was "Stealth", and Jet engined is like calling a Mustang being a copy of the Ford Model T

Ответить
@SKYlightsEBE
@SKYlightsEBE - 26.10.2013 10:05

Hell looks dangerous as in not solid

Ответить
@1s0s50
@1s0s50 - 19.07.2014 04:27

For the Navy to land on Air craft carrier's. ><
    

Ответить
@purplehaze6t9
@purplehaze6t9 - 28.12.2014 08:43

damn thing looks like a ufo lol at night that could be mistaken for a ufo maybe that's a lot of the sighting's people have been reporting from the last few years. that and other craft we have that very few even know about.

Ответить
@jaibhimadevi5805
@jaibhimadevi5805 - 19.12.2017 02:26

Probably what USS Princeton tracked in 2004.

Ответить
@alph4096
@alph4096 - 23.11.2019 05:30

Autonomous lethal weapons are a real threat. IFO really existed.

Ответить