Комментарии:
Seat Arona and T Roc are the same car from same VW group :-0 The C3 is more a family car ...
ОтветитьThis is among the first (and hardest) reviews I've found on the web about Citroen's Aircross, strange how so many others are praising it, quite a contrast with the recent awards: 2018 Carbuyer-Best Small SUV and AUTOBEST “Best Buy Car of Europe” 2018...
ОтветитьI am getting more and more frustrated with british car reviews, mostly as it is absolutely irrelevant which cars they test, the results will always be the same. There are only two (luxury brands excluded) brands that will get a british presenter's seal of approval. VW (and all related brands of the VAGinal connection) and for some unexplainable reason Ford. Everything else is by proxy crap, or faulty. It is beyond me how and why this is the case. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but honestly the eyes of the VW beholder suffer from a serious illness. Most cars are as original as a home apliance, with the exception of the Scirocco and the Beatle, which were both canceled due to (ironicly) not being in compliance with the "family design"??. The interior is (wel built granted) but as dull as ditch water, or full of colors (T-ROC and Polo), my personal oppinion is that in both cases it is "less is less" and to much is also "less". Lot's of people seem to like it, but i doubt they really love it. The mytihcal reliability is unfortunately only a myth nowadays. 2.0 TDIs are exploding, 1.2 tsis are breaking chains (not in a revolutionary way), Dry clutch DSG on 1.2 and 1.4 are as reliable as a chinese handmade watch. But i have to addmit, the residual value is pretty amazing. I have to say, that the T-ROC does not look bad at all, but pricevise can not be compared to the Citroen. And than we get to the Ford. On the outside they mostly look ok, but it seems that they take the inspiration for interior design in 10+ year old korean cars. They drive fine, that ist t true, but the overall product feels like it hasn't been finished yet, and considering the price... In the town i live there is a car dealer which is selling Fords, Hyundais and Subarus. 15 or so years ago people came to buy a Ford, and browsed the Hyundais, today is the other way around, and you can't blame them. And it's not like Hyundais are cheaper, they aren't at all, but ill take the Tuscon over the Kuga anytime.
Ответитьc3 aircross best for me
ОтветитьCitroen is the best
ОтветитьI think you’ve missed the point of the C3 Aircross
ОтветитьEverybody thats commenting here dont seem to understand that the T-roc is actually the best of those three cars... But thats because its not in the same class as the c3 and Arona !!!! VW announced that they will be making a rival to those two and is called the T-cross... so this review is basically pointless...
ОтветитьNot exactly fair since SEAT is part of the Volkswagen/Audi Group. 2 against 1 and for some reason they weren't being unbiased either
ОтветитьIn Australia it’s all about Mazda superiority and in Britain it’s VW.
Utterly predictable.
Can’t wait to pick up my T roc
ОтветитьI thought SEAT are supposed to be the sporty, Spanish flair part of VW Group? The Arona is so dull and did I hear him mention scratchy plastics in the VW? They are EVERYWHERE!! So cheap looking. Not a huge fan of the C3 either but there is bias here!
ОтветитьAs I can see, in England is totally normal to compare cheap and expensive cars by the same standards? Are you corrupted or disonest I can't decide?
ОтветитьHas anyone noticed that the 6speed gearbox of Citroen c3 aircross is about 3-4 cm far to the front? I mean that when you put the 4th is where you would had a zero speed in a different car. I bought a c3 aircross and this is the only disadvantage i see. I have to straight up my hand in order to put the 3rd or 5th.
ОтветитьThe Citroen may depreciate heavily in the UK because of anti French sentiment, but in Spain it doesn't. So it is defo the best value due to its low starting and high finishing price after 3 years
ОтветитьI would definitely say the C3 aircross is best for the money!
ОтветитьShouldn't you compare T-Cross (not T-Rock) against these two models? Because SEAT Arona is based on SEAT Ibiza, and VW T-Rock is based on VW Golf, not on VW Polo. Not very fair to compare Ibiza with Golf - you should compare it to Polo. And because T-Cross is based on Polo I believe it's more logical to compare Arona vs. T-Cross (and Ateca vs. T-Rock). Then everything comes to a place: SEAT models are better than VW.
ОтветитьDo you still have Vauxhall in UK not seen many reviews
ОтветитьDon’t buy the aircross, mine is year old had two recalls , is still in at Arnold Clark Aberdeen, they are another waste of space, terrible after sales service , they should have kept the c3 Picasso , second recall is for airbag wiring fault , have had to strip out the dash , don’t know when I will get it back. Bloody Arnold Clark won’t give me courtesy car, cheapskate bastards..
ОтветитьBut T-Roc is one class above. İt is not fair to compare them...
ОтветитьIt is funny how people live in denial lol The T-roc is clearly the better vehicle at everything, the others only win in term of price.
ОтветитьT roc and arona are the same
ОтветитьThe Seat and VW are not just "slightly more expensive" they are way more expensive than the citron C3, I think this review is a Joke
ОтветитьBit unfair as not all the same tier. Should have tested a T-cross and not a T-roc. If the T-Cross was out at the time.
ОтветитьWhere I live you can buy a top spec Citroen for that same price as the entry level T-Roc
ОтветитьT roc best for me
ОтветитьC3 is the best
Original.
Comfortable.
Nice to look at.
You people are obsessed with backbreaking german cars. Not to mention their overpriced plastics.
What a total load of **
Obviously sponsored by the VW group. If you actually was to live with each car and had to buy and trade in with your own money you would face reality.
I’m 64 married and we both drive, I’m 6’2 my wife is 5’2 we carry grandchildren everywhere. In 18 months we have covered 22000 miles. We have had not one fault , not one rattle and is probably one of the nicest cars we have ever owned. The 6 speed gearbox is now as smooth as silk and in no way notchy! It leaves other cars standing and brakes top notch. I have left Fiestas standing and it cruises at speeds you probably should not.
When buying Golfs in the past the trade in prices have been laughable as have Fords. I have had more cars than I can remember and this C3 aircross flair 130hp and dealership has been the best experience ever. PS, I also had a Caymen for 4 years and still enjoy jumping in the aircross.
Before watching this video I knew instinctively what you were going to choose.
Also you consider it difficult to use the infotainment screen.
How hard is it to press up or down to adjust temperature, if you require radio press music icon, if you require navigation,press the compass symbol.
You guys ....lost for words.
Weird group , t roc is from class ( size ) above, t cross is more similar......
ОтветитьWhat a car the C3, !!!!!!! If you want to drive a car with pleasure. Don"t make the mistake to choice another one. Cheap and have alle you wish. Only for people who likes all that things what we never use in our life, take an other car. May be a Lexus or Lamborghini. Or Ferrari is also a good one , if you have the money.
ОтветитьT-cross would be a better comparison with those 2. The T-roc is should be compared to a c4 cactus and alteca.
Ответитьt-roc PLASTIK.
ОтветитьI'm tired of these reviews constantly praising VW/seat/Skoda and dissing others. I find the VW and Seat incredibly bland. I'd choose the C3 Aircross everytime over those others
ОтветитьDisagree with this review, bought the C3 Aircross, cheap, comfy, easy to drive, lots of room for the family. Still enjoy driving it, either around town, or on motorways. VW are too expensive for what they are, and the drive is a bit underwhelming. I do like SEAT’s, but not as comfortable as the Citroen. In addition I didn’t pay anything like as much as quoted in this video.....
ОтветитьThe t roc is to expensive I will save money end get the seat
ОтветитьWhat Car is always biased towards French cars......
ОтветитьYou've essentially tested a Polo against a Golf and chucked in a C3 to make up the numbers. Guess what? The Golf won. Who could have guessed?
ОтветитьYou should definitely review your facts first. This is probably the most biased review I have seen for small SUVs with so much hate for a French car. And why put Arona and T-Roc in a 3 way comparison when they are from the same VW group? Bring in a Korean car, maybe, diversify things a little bit.
ОтветитьCrap review - I have an aircross and its gear change is perfectly fine
ОтветитьI think this is a bit of a joke. What do these guys now about cars.
ОтветитьThat Citroen is hideously ugly
ОтветитьCitroen is little bit uncomfortable?
You may say anything You want but Citroen’s comfort is unquestionable.
VW SUV Compact T-Roc for me & Thank You So Much 🚗
ОтветитьLong live Citroen, its beautiful designs and supreme suspensions. This review is biased to the bone!
ОтветитьIs c3 aircross as good as C4 or dacia duster?
ОтветитьA biased review based on brand snobbery. There are other videos that give more balanced and accurate reviews than this one. What Car are an elitist outfit that make people pay for their so-called superior reviews. Total waste of space.
ОтветитьCitroen C3 Aircross gear shift is just obsenely vague. The same goes, for the sterring which seems to be in a potato bag. Also the stop-start is just dumb. I had one as a rental car for a week and hated it to the core. A typical French car: funky outide and junky inside.
Ответить