Комментарии:
Traxler suck after bishop f7
ОтветитьAll cool and nice but real question is should I than force white to go with Fried Liver so I can use this tricks against him or should I always try to prevent him doing Fried Liver in the first place ? I am talking about low elo.
ОтветитьThe problem with the traxler is if white took with the Bishop, he is just up a pawn, d4 is the better response if you are facing someone who knows what is he doing.
ОтветитьThanks brother. I watched with tears in my eyes. (Eric Satie)
ОтветитьVery good
ОтветитьYou've got the name a bit confused. Ng5 isn't the Fried Liver.
ОтветитьYou sare best man the way you explain all variations it’s really awesome thank u so much
ОтветитьGreat video ...thanks
ОтветитьWhat if they take f7 with bishop instead of knight?
ОтветитьI haven't seen tus attack since i was about 850. But i only push pawns til about move 10
ОтветитьOMG!!!!!!
ОтветитьFried Liver is the best. ;)!
ОтветитьTraxler gambit nice. There's another one by chess academy and it's absolutly savage. You let them take the rook but then you deliver a smoothered checkmate in a few moves with the knight it's so nasty lol!!
ОтветитьThis is nasty and easy to play lol. I have so many counters to fried liver now 😂😂😂😂
ОтветитьYou didn't show "what if Bf2, Kf1?
ОтветитьAre you singaporean?
ОтветитьAmazing class🎉❤
ОтветитьWhat if white castles first
ОтветитьPlease change the board color so the black pieces are more visible.
Thanks.
Well narrated and I like the variants.
What do you do if opponent uses bishop to take your f3 pawn instead?
ОтветитьPerpetual
ОтветитьNice
Ответитьwhy does this dude sound like that feng shui guy?
ОтветитьBackground music was so annoying that I stopped watching after 3 minutes, couldn't focus on what he's saying 😢
ОтветитьIs there a video where you analyse if white takes with the bishop on f3 -on the fried liver attack - instand of with the horse?...
ОтветитьBellissima!
ОтветитьWhat if white attacks with the bishop forcing check, instead of the knight on the initial attack?
Ответитьgood but what if White plays Bxf7 instead of Nxf7?
Ответитьgood
Ответитьwhat if after h6 they capture the knight with the bishop?
Ответитьbroo You made me Go fron 800 elo to 1400 buddy thanks a alot for your videos ❤
ОтветитьBeautiful
ОтветитьGood lines, but the problem with this is that it basically forces you to do e5 just in case they go for the fried liver attack. If you want to play something like the King's Indian Defense by playing d6 of g6, you're screwed.
Ответить5 Bxf7+. +-
ОтветитьThank you for such a thorough lesson of the Traxler counter!
ОтветитьWhat if they capture the pawn with bishop instead of knight in the beginning? Then we are down a pawn
Ответитьthank yoou
ОтветитьJust amazing
ОтветитьBRutal counter
ОтветитьThanks I first time destroyed a 1200 rated player who tried to fry my liver 😮
ОтветитьBut there’s one variation when opponent played pawn to d3 to defend e4 pawn and then start fry liver attack by moving knight to g6. This variation is hard to handle
ОтветитьThanks my dude
ОтветитьThought this would reasonably easy to commit to memory until you got to the what if king doesn't take our bishop. Then a whole new set of lines need remembering.
ОтветитьSir Superb Explation....I highly impressed...God bless you....
Ответить